[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86 Boot enhancements, boot protocol 2.04 7/9
    Tom Rini <> writes:

    > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:41:55AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > > In imitation of the arm and ppc ports a CONFIG_CMDLINE option is also
    > > implemented.
    > Just wondering, why didn't you do it with a
    > CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOL/CONFIG_CMDLINE set of options? The way you did it,
    > I _think_ you can't actually get a help msg from 'config' or
    > 'oldconfig', you'll just set the commandline to '?'.

    I just tested it and oldconfig at least works. The overhead is exactly
    one byte.

    > Also, on current PPC, if we have a compiled-in commandline we put it in
    > arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c and allow it to be overridden. This even makes
    > it semi-useful outside of the self-containted {b,}zImage situation.

    I currently allow a compiled in command line to be appended to. lilo also
    does this when you specify a command line, and to my knowledge all boot options
    prefer the last value specified so that should be good enough. As the decision
    happens in C code it isn't to hard to change either way.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.021 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site