lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [OFF TOPIC] BK license change
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > In short: go build a better answer, and until you do it, how about
> > easing off on the "BK is evil corporate software" mantra a bit? It's
>
> BK *is* evil corporate software, with unique trapdoor capabilities, and
> with unique ability to take away rights from user any time it wants.

BK is made available to us at no cost; BK is saving Linus and
Marcelo a lot of work, making it possible for them to merge more
patches into the kernel.

If you only spent 10% of the energy you spent complaining on
making a bitkeeper replacement, maybe you'd realise that Larry
is making a very useful contribution.

regards,

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.073 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site