[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: AW: Re: AW: Re: VLAN and Network Drivers 2.4.x
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:07:23PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:49:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> ...
> > The tulip patch is butt-ugly - the oversized allocation isn't needed,
> > and it just flat-out turns off large packet protection. That's really
> > not what you want to do, even for the best tulip cards. If an oversized
> > gram (non-VLAN) makes it into a network which such a patched tulip
> > driver, you can DoS.
> It all depends... At least the cisco switches I have used have
> protection by controlling on how large frames you can send, and
> having automatic enlarging of frame size for VLAN Trunking port.
> Of course those switches have some amounts of "jumbogram support"
> as well at port by port basis.
> So perhaps you can DoS your machine off the net (or your stream
> very least), but not other machines.

The DoS certainly assumes that one can send jumbo datagrams to the
target machine via a local network. There are a multitude of ways
one can prevent the DoS present in the tulip VLAN patch, what you
name is certainly one of them.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.090 / U:3.516 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site