lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
    Date
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 06:20, David S. Miller wrote:
    > From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
    > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:31:43 +0100
    >
    > Alexander Viro Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
    >
    > > As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of
    > > patches since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell
    > > whether it hurts orSure, except no-one cares about this point.
    >
    > Sure, except no-one cares about this point.
    >
    > the documentation is the 'sticky wicket'...
    >
    > Incorrect. The argument for the documentation was that it along with
    > other things wrt. BK create some "barrier to entry" for Linux kernel
    > development and almost force someone to use BK.

    It was my argument, so I'm qualified to say what it was. Ian Molton is correct,
    your interpretation is strictly secondary.

    --
    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.021 / U:182.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site