[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
On Sunday 21 April 2002 06:20, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Molton <>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:31:43 +0100
> Alexander Viro Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> > As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of
> > patches since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell
> > whether it hurts orSure, except no-one cares about this point.
> Sure, except no-one cares about this point.
> the documentation is the 'sticky wicket'...
> Incorrect. The argument for the documentation was that it along with
> other things wrt. BK create some "barrier to entry" for Linux kernel
> development and almost force someone to use BK.

It was my argument, so I'm qualified to say what it was. Ian Molton is correct,
your interpretation is strictly secondary.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.174 / U:1.732 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site