lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
Date
On Sunday 21 April 2002 06:20, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:31:43 +0100
>
> Alexander Viro Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
>
> > As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of
> > patches since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell
> > whether it hurts orSure, except no-one cares about this point.
>
> Sure, except no-one cares about this point.
>
> the documentation is the 'sticky wicket'...
>
> Incorrect. The argument for the documentation was that it along with
> other things wrt. BK create some "barrier to entry" for Linux kernel
> development and almost force someone to use BK.

It was my argument, so I'm qualified to say what it was. Ian Molton is correct,
your interpretation is strictly secondary.

--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans