Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:06:34 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 22 April 2002 22:57, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:42:46PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Monday 22 April 2002 22:18, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin > > > > > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement > > > > > for Swansea: > > > > > > > > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > > > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > > > > > > > > > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically... > > > > > > > > Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were > > > > held to that level, I would be satisfied. > > > > > > <chuckle> -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a > > > pointless advertisement. > > > > You'd want to get rid of the url that points at your docs? > > "that level" was assuming you were referring to the URL-free printk > advertisement I quoted above.
Oh, I was thinking "a few lines", regardless of content.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |