Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:30:59 -0400 | From | Doug Ledford <> | Subject | Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... |
| |
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:25:37PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > To imply that the BK doc is an intentioned advertisement is silly. > It's in the kernel source tree to help people with, like it or not, what > is a part of kernel development. An _optional_ part.
Which is *exactly* why it belongs with the kernel docs, and not on bitkeeper's web site. It's an optional part of the kernel process, and just because BK has a license some people don't like is no reason to *not* document how that optional process works.
-- Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233 Red Hat, Inc. 1801 Varsity Dr. Raleigh, NC 27606
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |