[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:25:37PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> To imply that the BK doc is an intentioned advertisement is silly.
> It's in the kernel source tree to help people with, like it or not, what
> is a part of kernel development. An _optional_ part.

Which is *exactly* why it belongs with the kernel docs, and not on
bitkeeper's web site. It's an optional part of the kernel process, and
just because BK has a license some people don't like is no reason to
*not* document how that optional process works.

Doug Ledford <> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.252 / U:4.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site