Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:05:25 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote: > (Linus CC removed) > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Focussed on BitKeeper. It's the license. Simple, we can all coexist happily, > > and profit from each other's endeavors, but our little commons here should not > > be carrying Bitkeeper ads. > > Should we remove all mention of .com email addresses too? > > On of the very few requirements of my job at mandrakesoft is to use > a mandrakesoft.com email address... as advertisement. Many other > email addresses are used similarly. reiserfs included _blatant_ > advertisements in printk, for the sponsors of the code. A ton of > other code has similar advertisements, though not at > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement > for Swansea: > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...
Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were held to that level, I would be satisfied.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |