lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
    Date
    On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > (Linus CC removed)
    >
    > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > Focussed on BitKeeper. It's the license. Simple, we can all coexist happily,
    > > and profit from each other's endeavors, but our little commons here should not
    > > be carrying Bitkeeper ads.
    >
    > Should we remove all mention of .com email addresses too?
    >
    > On of the very few requirements of my job at mandrakesoft is to use
    > a mandrakesoft.com email address... as advertisement. Many other
    > email addresses are used similarly. reiserfs included _blatant_
    > advertisements in printk, for the sponsors of the code. A ton of
    > other code has similar advertisements, though not at
    >
    > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin
    > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement
    > for Swansea:
    >
    > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
    > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
    >
    > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...

    Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were
    held to that level, I would be satisfied.

    --
    Daniel
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:2.284 / U:0.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site