lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:

> As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of patches
> since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell whether it
> hurts or not, right? Well, it doesn't. So far the only difference was
> in the quality (and latency) of changelogs and that was definitely welcome.

"me too". Actually, I found it easier to get the Trivial patches in, and
about the same for per-cpu and futex patches. I don't bk.

When patches didn't go in, it's more due to Mingo Theorum[1] than being
non-bk. And that's a Good Thing for calibrating my coding tastes upwards.

Rusty.
[1] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201291324560.3610-100000@localhost.localdomain>
--
there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans