lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
    On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:05:27 -0400 (EDT)
    Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote:

    > As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of patches
    > since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell whether it
    > hurts or not, right? Well, it doesn't. So far the only difference was
    > in the quality (and latency) of changelogs and that was definitely welcome.

    "me too". Actually, I found it easier to get the Trivial patches in, and
    about the same for per-cpu and futex patches. I don't bk.

    When patches didn't go in, it's more due to Mingo Theorum[1] than being
    non-bk. And that's a Good Thing for calibrating my coding tastes upwards.

    Rusty.
    [1] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201291324560.3610-100000@localhost.localdomain>
    --
    there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
    many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.023 / U:0.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site