lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:28:36AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich escreveu:
> > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> > > different?
> >
> > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
> > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
>
> So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet
> another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390

Don't know, tried to submit?

Just checked, Hercules is not a proprietary emulator, in fact it is licensed
under the QPL. http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/herclic.html

> mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home
> page...

> Developing kernel stuff on 390 without emulator can be much fun as host
> operators tend to get very pissed if the IPL ratio comes near to 1/min ;-)

<joke>
Another good question: does Linus cares about Linux S/390? ;)
</joke>

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.282 / U:9.036 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site