[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:57:59AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> > But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's
> > contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.
> I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.

Sure he did.

> He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.
> We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> different?

The docs are not proprietary.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans