[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sunday 21 April 2002 17:33, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:30:38AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> >
> > > > Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit.
> > > > A link to the information is completely sufficient.
> > >
> > > What was Daniel's action? Remove the text. Nothing else. Sure, he
> > > suggested other options, but he did attempt to implement them? No.
> >
> > Be realistic - how is he supposed to do that?
> It's really trivial to put a document up on a Web site, before
> submitting a patch to remove said document. Or to contact someone, and
> get them to post the doc.
> Did he even attempt to do that? No.

You're wrong. I suggested posting the documents on the bitkeeper site among
other things and Larry agreed to do that. What do you think I should have done,
demanded that Larry do that?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.105 / U:20.036 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site