[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sunday 21 April 2002 17:33, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:30:38AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
    > > Jeff Garzik Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
    > >
    > > > > Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit.
    > > > > A link to the information is completely sufficient.
    > > >
    > > > What was Daniel's action? Remove the text. Nothing else. Sure, he
    > > > suggested other options, but he did attempt to implement them? No.
    > >
    > > Be realistic - how is he supposed to do that?
    > It's really trivial to put a document up on a Web site, before
    > submitting a patch to remove said document. Or to contact someone, and
    > get them to post the doc.
    > Did he even attempt to do that? No.

    You're wrong. I suggested posting the documents on the bitkeeper site among
    other things and Larry agreed to do that. What do you think I should have done,
    demanded that Larry do that?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.024 / U:23.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site