[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jochen Friedrich wrote:

> > Huh? BK requires no more net access than you require when submitting
> > a regular patch. You need to be connected to move the bits.
> Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and
> reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this
> environment.

So you're telling me that what I've been doing over the
last months really shouldn't have been possible ?

Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.201 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site