[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:08, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Plus, the url saves download
> > bandwidth. A compelling argument I'd say.
> The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked. If you care about
> bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth
> compared to diff and patch.

All you said is 'it doesn't waste *that* much bandwidth'. Remember, this is
the place we spend days arguing over a cycle or two.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.133 / U:4.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site