[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:46:16AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
> > a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
> well, this raises an interesting point...
> should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
> not?

No, it doesn't raise this point. Documentation is licensed either
separately, or with the package containing it. As it is here.

There is no "should it be regarded" questions.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean