lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
    On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 04:46:16AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
    > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
    >
    > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
    > > a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
    >
    > well, this raises an interesting point...
    >
    > should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
    > not?

    No, it doesn't raise this point. Documentation is licensed either
    separately, or with the package containing it. As it is here.

    There is no "should it be regarded" questions.

    Jeff



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.022 / U:31.132 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site