| Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 10:27:27 -0600 | From | Richard Gooch <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
Daniel Phillips writes: > On Saturday 20 April 2002 18:13, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > Daniel, > > > > This is not documentation for bitkeeper but how to use bitkeeper > > effectively for kernel development. It happens to be DAMN USEFULL > > documentation at that for anyone wanting to use bitkeeper for kernel > > development so IMO it fully belongs in the kernel. Just like the > > SubmittingPatches document does, too. Or are you going to remove that as well? > > By that logic, we should also include the lkml FAQ in the kernel > tree. Should we?
No. A pointer to the lkml FAQ is sufficient.
Regards,
Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|