Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree | Date | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:11:55 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:57, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Let's pull back a little from the proselytizing, shall we? I'll modify > > my proposal to 'include just a pointer to the bk documentation in the > > kernel tree itself'. This should satisfy everybody. > > No, it doesn't. It was put into the tree for convenience.
How much less convenient is it to click on a link? So much harder that it's worth pissing off some key developers?
> It therefore stands to reason that removing it creates inconvenience. > Further, the only reason to remove it is ideology. i.e. something > other than technical merit. So your proposal is still a no-go.
According to you, yes. I'll leave it on the table.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |