lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...
From
   From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:31:43 +0100

Alexander Viro Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of
> patches since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell
> whether it hurts orSure, except no-one cares about this point.

Sure, except no-one cares about this point.

the documentation is the 'sticky wicket'...

Incorrect. The argument for the documentation was that it along with
other things wrt. BK create some "barrier to entry" for Linux kernel
development and almost force someone to use BK. That someone just
submitting patches is somehow "left out".

Al is showing that these claims are not well founded at all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.466 / U:5.756 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site