lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:16:29AM +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:02:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > That would actually make the development process MORE open than it was
> > > before BK, and might make even non-BK people appreciate BK more simply
> > > because there is a real point to it.
> >
> > Well, it would be more like working in a fishbowl anyway. The part that's
> > missing is the discussion. Just looking at the recent traffic... there's
>
> Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big
> and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If
> this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not
> get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with

I can certainly do this for the tree on bkbits.net, i.e., it emails the
lk list when it gets new work. Linus?
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.160 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site