[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:40, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:16:29AM +1000, CaT wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:02:04PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > > That would actually make the development process MORE open than it was
> > > > before BK, and might make even non-BK people appreciate BK more simply
> > > > because there is a real point to it.
> > >
> > > Well, it would be more like working in a fishbowl anyway. The part that's
> > > missing is the discussion. Just looking at the recent traffic... there's
> >
> > Ok. I admit I haven't read through the entire thread. It's a wee bit big
> > and painful so excuse me if this has already been suggested but... If
> > this is the biggest (or one of the biggest) sticking points then why not
> > get BK to email the lk mailing list when there's a patch submitted with
> I can certainly do this for the tree on, i.e., it emails the
> lk list when it gets new work. Linus?

Horse, barn. We need a solution that works before the patch gets applied.

Perhaps that's what you're talking about?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.324 / U:10.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site