[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:11:52AM -0700, John Alvord escreveu:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> > > > different?
> > >
> > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
> > > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
> >
> > So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet
> > another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390
> > mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home
> > page...
> <Puzzled> I thought hercules was an open source project... There are some
> prioriatery 390 emulators (UMX, Flex) but not hercules.

As I said, its QPLed, so non-proprietary but subject to flamefest, but lets
stick (not me, thanks) to the regular bk ones ;)

- Arnaldo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.146 / U:11.524 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site