Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 04:46:16 +0100 | From | Ian Molton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about > a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
well, this raises an interesting point...
should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or not?
is this 'bitkeeper documentation', 'documentation about bitkeeper', or 'linux kernel documentation', or what? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |