[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Daniel Phillips wrote:

> My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's
> tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK
> patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed.

I think your conclusion is wrong and there has always gone patches directly to
Linus even before BK. With BK we can actually see who did what and often why so if
something gets in that should not we know who to blame. If anything this should
make people think one extra time before hitting the send button.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.315 / U:2.612 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site