lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's
> contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.

I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.

He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.

We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
different?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.238 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site