lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:01:35AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> My conclusion: though there are more BK patches being applied to Linus's
> tree than non-BK, they are generating less discussion on lkml than non-BK
> patches do. Or to put it bluntly: BK patches are not being discussed.

Or maybe using a SCM puts more pressure on the developper which
writes better code, which will get accepted with less discussion.

In general, when you seek discussion with a quick and dirty piece
of code, you post a patch, not the BK equivalent, since you know
this will not get accepted anyway...

Stelian.
--
Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com>
Alcove - http://www.alcove.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean