[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:57:59AM +0100, Ian Molton escreveu:
> Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> > But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's
> > contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.
> I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.
> He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.
> We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> different?

The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.

- Arnaldo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.218 / U:9.564 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site