[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB device support for2.5.8(take2)
> That said, target or client or anything else distinctive sounds fine
> too. I'm just partial to the spec-derived-naming idea. (Although I
> really wish the USB spec folks could have come up with two names that
> were more descriptively different...)

Why you do you want to derive a name from the specs ?
Someone who has read them will no what is refered to
whatever we name it. The significance of a the name
is important to those who look into usb code occasionaly.
These typically haven't read the spec.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.033 / U:5.200 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site