[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB device support for2.5.8(take2)
    > That said, target or client or anything else distinctive sounds fine
    > too. I'm just partial to the spec-derived-naming idea. (Although I
    > really wish the USB spec folks could have come up with two names that
    > were more descriptively different...)

    Why you do you want to derive a name from the specs ?
    Someone who has read them will no what is refered to
    whatever we name it. The significance of a the name
    is important to those who look into usb code occasionaly.
    These typically haven't read the spec.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.020 / U:4.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site