[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated
On Friday 19. April 2002 05:21, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:

> And it seems to be more important on UDP sendfile().
> processes or threads sharing the same UDP socket would affect each other,
> while processes or threads on TCP sockets don't care about it as TCP
> connection is peer to peer.

No. It is not the lack of peer-to-peer connections that gives rise to the
bottleneck, but the idea of several threads multiplexing sendfile() through a
single socket. Given a bad program design, it can be done over TCP too.

The conclusion is that the programmer really ought to choose a different
design. For multimedia streaming, for instance, it makes sense to use 1 UDP
socket per thread rather than to multiplex the output through one socket.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.102 / U:1.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site