Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:39:20 -0700 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat |
| |
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:44:18PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:30:16PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > under testing. Also, Andrew found a problem with your locking changes when > > he split up your patch, and at the time you were saying it is ready and > > there were no bug reports against in... > > btw, it was a problem only for ext3. >
Right, I forgot to mention that.
> > Does this patch conflict in any way with your vm patches? If not they > > should be able to co-exist. > > it will generate rejects, but that's not the problem. My point is that > your same argument about merging in later kernels, stable kernel tree, > could be applied to patches that makes no difference to users too. >
True. Has Rik's cleanup already been merged into 2.5?
> Andrea > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |