[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: FIXED_486_STRING ?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 02:44:06AM +0200, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 10:27:18AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > Dead code, it has been dead since at least 2.0.21. Unless somebody
> > wants to fix the string-486 code, delete FIXED_486_STRING,
> > CONFIG_X86_USE_STRING_486 and include/asm-i386/string-486.h.
> I proposed doing this a few months back, then someone stepped forward
> who had worked on these routines recently and fixed up whatever problems
> they originally exhibited. Deleting the dead code from 2.2 / 2.4 probably
> makes sense, but it'd be nice to have the 2.5 ones fixed up.
> Dave.
Yes, the special code for Pentium is important for it, as that code is
faster and shorter. The last signature in string-486.h is of
2000/05/09, so, if this is true, the problems have not been fixed.
So, what is the real situation? I would like to fix the code, and it
seems that I'm not alone :)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.073 / U:0.892 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site