[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: FIXED_486_STRING ?
    On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:38:26AM +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
    > Yes, the special code for Pentium is important for it, as that code is
    > faster and shorter. The last signature in string-486.h is of
    > 2000/05/09, so, if this is true, the problems have not been fixed.
    > So, what is the real situation? I would like to fix the code, and it
    > seems that I'm not alone :)

    Petko Manolov <> did some work on them circa 2.4.0test.
    His patch is at
    Aparently there are still 1-2 problems with these routines which is
    why he hasn't pushed for inclusion I guess.

    | Dave Jones.
    | SuSE Labs
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.039 / U:6.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site