lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 0(1)-patch, where did it go?
From
Date
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 23:27, Dieter Nützel wrote:

> But I see some kernel hangs with preemption on UP.
> It happens only during "make bzlilo" (the linking stage). Robert?
> Apart from that it works well.

It is probably lock-break, not preempt. I don't have lock-break patches
for 2.4.19-pre yet. Lock-break/low-latency and the more general lock
breaking / explicit schedule work is very reliant on the version of the
kernel they were designed against. This is why this approach is not a
proper long-term solution ...

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.032 / U:14.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site