lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: 0(1)-patch, where did it go?
Date
> You can get an up-to-date version in the 2.4.19-pre6-jam1 patcset in
>
> http://giga.cps.unizar.es/~magallon/linux/kernel/

Didn't you noticed any of the reports about very bad numbers for latency since
Ingo's latest 2.4.17-K3 version?
Even Alan's tree show the same (latest I've checked was 2.4.19-pre2-ac2).

We do need some words from Ingo first.
He haven't answered my posts since February ;-(
But yaybe he didn't got them 'cause I send them to mingo@elte.hu ???

If you run without O(1) latency is like before.
You'll get better numbers with preemption+lock-break (ongoing merge of
Andrew's lowlatency patches).

But I see some kernel hangs with preemption on UP.
It happens only during "make bzlilo" (the linking stage). Robert?
Apart from that it works well.

-Dieter

--
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.039 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site