[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Futexes IV (Fast Lightweight Userspace Semaphores)
> > It's not just 386 vs later due to cmpxchg. It's also the simple issue of
> > UP vs SMP - a UP system still wants to do locking, but it doesn't need the
> > lock prefix. And that lock prefix makes a _huge_ difference
> > performance-wise.
> Fail to see why that matters. User level locking is mostly beneficial on SMPs.
> So, you lock the bus for the atomic update. This is UP, nothing's going on
> on the bus anyway.

Lots of older x86 is too stupid to optimise exclusive cache line locked
operations. After all the bus is still shared - PCI bus masters for one

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.048 / U:8.596 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site