[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Futexes IV (Fast Lightweight Userspace Semaphores)

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Hubertus Franke wrote:
> But what about compatibility with i368, no cmpxchg or cmpxchg8b
> Can't we have to types and infer from the op in the kernel what
> the correct size in user space is.

I think the next step should be to map in one page of kernel code in a
user-readable location, and just do it there.

It's not just 386 vs later due to cmpxchg. It's also the simple issue of
UP vs SMP - a UP system still wants to do locking, but it doesn't need the
lock prefix. And that lock prefix makes a _huge_ difference

So my suggestion is: ignore i386 for now (no _relevant_ SMP boxes exist
anyway), and plan on solving the problem with a separate library page
before 2.6.x gets released.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.159 / U:3.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site