Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Mar 2002 18:58:57 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers |
| |
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Problem? Well partly I just can't be assed to use the thing because > I'm comfortable with my own scripts and all revision control systems > just get in your face and suck.
That's what I thought too, but bitkeeper has convinced me to get over that prejudice ;)
> But also because I'm here to improve the body of public software, > and at the end of the day, any support which I put into bitkeeper > won't help there. (using == supporting).
That's a tradeoff everybody has to make for himself. Personally the time bitkeeper saves me helps improving Linux a lot, so using bitkeeper does help increase my contribution to the body of public software.
Of course, this is everybody's personal choice and you're just as right (or wrong) as I am ;)
regards,
Rik -- <insert bitkeeper endorsement here>
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |