[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Monolithic Vs. Microkernel

    > > Not *all* of them. On vsta, you could do
    > >
    > > ( killall keyboard; sleep 1; keyboard ) &
    > >
    > > to change your keymap. On linux you need special tools for managing
    > > modules and are not protected from module bugs. Try developing filesystem
    > > on production box.... You can do that on u-kernels.
    > Userland filesystems != microkernel.

    Yep, but microkernel => userland filesystems ;-). Anyway, they *can*
    do things linux can't do (or linux has hard time with), like
    partitioning physical machine into few logical ones, filesystems in
    userland, ability to debug drivers on production machines, etc.

    I like those features, but I'm not sure if costs introduced by
    u-kernels are worth it.
    (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S.
    no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.021 / U:23.804 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site