lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 05:48:49PM +0300, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
> Replying to Dave Jones:
> > Something I've not yet worked out is why none of the proponents of
> > arch, subversion etc are offering to run a mirror of Linus'
> > bitkeeper tree for those who don't want to use bk, but
> > "must have 0-day kernels".
>
> Because they do not want bitkeeper, and do not know how to bk pull & export
> WITHOUT bk itself :)

Really, that's too stupid for words. Let them first figure out how to
keep the data from passing through any proprietary routers in the Internet.

The real answer is that they can't do it.



--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.044 / U:3.368 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site