lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers
From
Date
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> writes:

> The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote:
> >
> > [ succinctness ]
> >
>
> fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which
> you outline.

I also prefer not to use Bitkeeper as long as possible for similar reasons
and because it is too slow and clumpsy
(although it is already very hard because often source is only available
through it, e.g. for ppc or for 2.5 pre patches now -- hopefully this trend
does not continue)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:21    [W:0.078 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site