Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 06 Mar 2002 10:40:44 +0100 |
| |
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> writes:
> The Open Source Club at The Ohio State University wrote: > > > > [ succinctness ] > > > > fwiw, I prefer to not use bitkeeper, for the reasons which > you outline.
I also prefer not to use Bitkeeper as long as possible for similar reasons and because it is too slow and clumpsy (although it is already very hard because often source is only available through it, e.g. for ppc or for 2.5 pre patches now -- hopefully this trend does not continue)
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |