lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.4.19-pre2]
We don't need the silly spinlock wrappers in 2.4 either.....

>
> + * Wrapper for disabling interrupts.
> + * (note : inline, so optimised away)
> + */
> +static inline void
> +wv_splhi(net_local * lp,
> + unsigned long * pflags)
> +{
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->spinlock, *pflags);
> + /* Note : above does the cli(); itself */
> +}
> +
> +/*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +/*
> + * Wrapper for re-enabling interrupts.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +wv_splx(net_local * lp,
> + unsigned long * pflags)
> +{
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->spinlock, *pflags);
> +
> + /* Note : enabling interrupts on the hardware is done in wv_ru_start()
> + * via : outb(OP1_INT_ENABLE, LCCR(base));
> + */
> +}
> +

--
Jeff Garzik | Usenet Rule #2 (John Gilmore): "The Net interprets
Building 1024 | censorship as damage and routes around it."
MandrakeSoft |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.096 / U:14.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site