Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:19:38 -0500 (EST) | From | Shawn Starr <> | Subject | Re: [opensource] Re: Petition Against Official Endorsement of BitKeeper by Linux Maintainers |
| |
well let's see, it takes forever to do a bk clone its the verfication that slows things down hugely.
Shawn.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:46:27PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > > > > The only problem I have with BK is it's slow on a Pentium 200Mhz, vs > > CVS. ;/ Wish that would be fixed. > > > > How much (wall clock) time will it take to produce a patch with bk > compared to cvs? > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |