Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:48:02 -0300 (BRT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: latency & real-time-ness. |
| |
On 4 Mar 2002, Robert Love wrote:
> If rmap finds its way into 2.5, I and others have some ideas about ways > to optimize the algorithms to reduce lock hold time and benefit from > preemption. For example, Daniel Phillips has some ideas wrt > zap_page_range.
Feel free to help resolve these issues before rmap code gets merged. I'd prefer to be able to introduce rmap in small bits and pieces without breaking anything.
regards,
Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |