[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: latency & real-time-ness.
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 18:48, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > If rmap finds its way into 2.5, I and others have some ideas about ways
> > to optimize the algorithms to reduce lock hold time and benefit from
> > preemption. For example, Daniel Phillips has some ideas wrt
> > zap_page_range.
> Feel free to help resolve these issues before rmap code gets
> merged. I'd prefer to be able to introduce rmap in small bits
> and pieces without breaking anything.

The above was just an optimization ... rmap and preempt work fine

What Andrew Morton, I, and others intend to do for 2.5 is work on the
algorithms and locking issues to work on latency issues cleanly.

But I'll surely work on the issues wrt rmap ;)

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.067 / U:8.904 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site