[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Filesystem benchmarks: ext2 vs ext3 vs jfs vs minix
Matthew Kirkwood wrote:
> ...
> Yeah, I thought it was a little odd. Postgres does so much
> fsync()ing that I thought it may just have been that the lower
> overhead won out over ext2's cleverer layout. All the I/O was
> basically fsync-driven, so this test was only about write
> performance.

For fsync-intensive loads ext3's best mode is generally
data=journal. That way, an fsync is satisfied by a nice
single linear write to the journal.

With a high volume of data you'll quickly exhaust the
journal space so it would also be beneficial to create
a monster journal with, say, mke2fs -J 400.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.092 / U:1.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site