lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: fadvise syscall?
At 04:05 PM 3/22/2002 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>>
>> I disagree, and here's the main reasons:
>>
>> * fadvise(2) usefulness extends past open(2). It may be useful to call
>> it at various points during runtime.
>
>open(/proc/self/fd/0, O_NEW_FLAGS)?

So to use fadvise(), the system must have /proc mounted?



Not everybody mounts /proc -- it provides a lot of potential information to anybody who can access it ("hmm... they have a QZ48257 ethernet chipset [cat /proc/pci] -- lets see, sending this specific sequence of bytes in a TCP packet will lock up the receiver...").


--
Stevie-O

Real programmers use COPY CON PROGRAM.EXE

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.114 / U:15.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site