Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Mar 2002 17:11:16 +1100 | From | CaT <> | Subject | Re: Linux-2.4.19pre3-ac5 |
| |
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt handler > is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event. > > if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL) > BUG(); > ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey); > > If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else , never > called during a completion, and/or is dangling. It is a typo my bad :-( > > Edit and change it from "==" to "!="
Now I'm confused. Should that be != to ==? :) And every instance I find?
-- SOCCER PLAYER IN GENITAL-BITING SCANDAL --- "It was something between friends that I thought would have no importance until this morning when I got up and saw all the commotion in the news," Gallardo told a news conference. "It stunned me." Reyes told Marca that he had "felt a slight pinch." -- http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/1129soccer29-ON.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |