[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectCreating a per-task kernel space for kmap, user pagetables, et al
    Please forgive the following for deliberate simplifiations and accidental misunderstandings. 
    If you flame gently, *maybe* we can pull something useful out of the ashen remains ;-)

    This is an evolution of my original plan to do per-cpu persisent kmap pools a
    couple of months ago - thanks to Rik for pointing out this was not going to work.

    OK, so currently we divide the virtual address space into user space (u-space) and kernel
    space (k-space) at the PAGE_OFFSET boundary, with two fundamental differences that I'm
    interested in for the sake of this argument.

    1. u-space has different protections from k-space (ie user can't read/write it directly)

    2. u-space is per task. k-space is common across all tasks.

    Imagine we create a hybrid "u-k-space" with the protections of k-space, but the locality
    of u-space .... either by making part of the current k-space per task or by making part of
    the current u-space protected like k-space ... not sure which would be easier.

    This u-k-space would be a good area for at least two things (and probably others):

    1. A good place to put the process pagetables. We only use up the amount of virtual
    address space (vaddr space) for one task's pagetables - if we map them into ZONE_NORMAL
    (as current mainline) we use up vaddr space for *all* task's pagetables - if we map them
    through kmap (atomic or persistent), we pay dearly in tlbflushes.

    2. A good place to make a per-task kmap area. This would be on a pool system similar to
    the current persistent kmap. We would potentially do only a local cpu tlb_flush_all when
    this table ran out (though if we're clever, we can use the context switches tlb_flush to
    do this for us). This would make copy_to_user stuff that's currently done under kmap

    This, unfortunately, isn't a total solution - we may sometimes need to modify the task's
    pagetables from outside the process context, eg. swapout (thanks to dmc for pointing
    this out to me ;-)). For this, we'd just use the existing kmap mechanism to create another
    mapping to use temporarily, and we're no worse off than before. But on the whole I think
    it wins us enough to be worthwhile.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.022 / U:2.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site