[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > So it would be more straightforward to just allow the queue
> > to be grown later on?
> I agree with that too. I'm fine with the patch,


> I'm just a bit worried
> about the batch_request vs nr_requests ratio. Are you sure 1/4 is always
> a good ratio? In my previous testing, a batch value of more than 32 had
> little impact and usually changed things for the worse.

Well I just left it as it was for the default case...

I haven't tested much at all for different batching levels. And
in this area, tuning it for my combination of hardware probably
doesn't carry much relevance for Jeff's setup (for example).

And the change to FIFO wakeup may have invalidated your earlier

So hmm. I'll have a play with it, and if nothing obvious jumps
out, I'll just clamp it at 32.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.050 / U:1.352 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site