[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Bitkeeper licence issues

> > > > Pavel, the problem here is your fundamental distrust.
> > > By giving me binary-only installer you ask me to trust you. You ask me
> > > to trust you without good reason [it only generates .tar.gz and
> > > shellscript, why should it be binary? Was not shar designed to handle
> > > that?], and that's pretty suspect.
> >
> > Bitmover doing anything remotely suspect in an executable installer
> > would be commercial suicide, do you distrust realplayer too?
> And all our installer does, and I will give you the code if you want it,
> I'd be happy to even have Pavel audit it, is make two arrays,

Okay, you wanted audit ;-).

> main()
> {
> char installer_name[200];
> char data_name[200];
> char cmd[2048];
> int fd;
> fprintf(stderr, "Please wait while we unpack the installer...");
> sprintf(installer_name, "/tmp/installer%d", getpid());
> fd = creat(installer_name, 0777);

If nasty user on same system creates symlink (ln -s /etc/passwd
/tmp/installer123), he may overwrite any file on the system. You probably want

fd = open(installer_name, O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0755);

Same goes for data.
Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:2.509 / U:2.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site