Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Mar 2002 06:08:29 +0000 | From | Joel Becker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: futex and timeouts |
| |
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:39:50PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > Yep, sorry, my mistake. I suggest make it a relative "struct timespec > *" (more futureproof that timeval). It would make sense to split the > interface into futex_down and futex_up syuscalls, since futex_up > doesn't need a timeout arg, but I haven't for the moment.
Why waste a syscall? The user is going to be using a library wrapper. They don't have to know that futex_up() calls sys_futex(futex, FUTEX_UP, NULL);
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #182
"Be romantic."
http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec@evilplan.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |