[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: futex and timeouts
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 04:39:50PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Yep, sorry, my mistake. I suggest make it a relative "struct timespec
> *" (more futureproof that timeval). It would make sense to split the
> interface into futex_down and futex_up syuscalls, since futex_up
> doesn't need a timeout arg, but I haven't for the moment.

Why waste a syscall? The user is going to be using a library
wrapper. They don't have to know that futex_up() calls sys_futex(futex,



Life's Little Instruction Book #182

"Be romantic."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.059 / U:1.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site