lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile
    On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:27:26PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
    >
    > > > 554 .d_lookup
    > >
    > > Did you try the dcache patches?
    >
    > Not for this, I did do some benchmarking of the RCU dcache patches a
    > while ago which I should post.

    Please do ;-) This shows why we need to ease the pressure on dcache_lock.

    >
    > > Can you publish lockmeter stats?
    >
    > I didnt get a chance to run lockmeter, I tend to use the kernel profiler
    > and use a hacked readprofile (originally from tridge) that displays
    > profile hits vs assembly instruction. Thats usually good enough to work
    > out which spinlocks are a problem.

    Is this a PPC only hack ? Also, where can I get it ?

    Thanks
    --
    Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net
    Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.035 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site