[lkml]   [2002]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile
    On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:27:26PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
    > > > 554 .d_lookup
    > >
    > > Did you try the dcache patches?
    > Not for this, I did do some benchmarking of the RCU dcache patches a
    > while ago which I should post.

    Please do ;-) This shows why we need to ease the pressure on dcache_lock.

    > > Can you publish lockmeter stats?
    > I didnt get a chance to run lockmeter, I tend to use the kernel profiler
    > and use a hacked readprofile (originally from tridge) that displays
    > profile hits vs assembly instruction. Thats usually good enough to work
    > out which spinlocks are a problem.

    Is this a PPC only hack ? Also, where can I get it ?

    Dipankar Sarma <>
    Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.029 / U:26.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site